Analyzing argement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Analyzing argement - Essay ExampleIn Execution, Anna Quindlen argues that shoemakers last penalisation is wrong beca wont it does not achieve its coveted ends. She stresses that it cannot provide sufficient justice for victims and their families and it does not make any moral sense. These authors have similarities in the use of personal ideas and anecdotal and hypothetical evidence as evidence, logos through inductive reasoning and concord on oddment penaltys goals, and pathos through an empathic writing style that appeals to justice, although they discord in writing style, audience, and attitude toward death penalty. Quindlen is more persuasive than Mencken because her ironic tone emphatically argues that death penalty is wrong because it is simply morally insufficient as a form of retribution.These authors have similarities in the use of personal ideas and anecdotal and hypothetical evidence. Mencken talks about his personal ideas when attacking the opponents of death penalty . He argues from his personal viewpoint that crime deterrence is not the only goal of death penalty, and instead abreaction is practically considered and more important (1). By saying this, he shows that something more personal and emotional is dirty dog the need for death penalty. Quindlen also offers her personal ideas on death penalty. She admits that her guts govern her ideas on death penalty, which is why she can be hypocritical about it (450.3). Like Mencken, Quindlen personalizes her attack on death penalty by asserting her personal feelings toward it. In addition, both authors use anecdotal evidence as establishment for their arguments. For instance, Mencken says he has not heard any executioner who is complaining of his job and instead, he has known legion(predicate) who delighted in their ancient art, and practiced it toweringly (1). By saying ancient art, he is underlining the proud tradition behind death penalty. Quindlen also uses anecdotal evidence when she says t hat the justice system is